Dne 23. 06. 23 v 18:14 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 23. 06. 23 v 18:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):Dne 23. 06. 23 v 15:34 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a):On Fri, Jun 23 2023 at 01:07:39 PM +0200, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Please understand that (speaking of the user space packages, I cannotspeak for kernel) there are no other sources then the sources in GitLab,which is publicly accessible (AFAIK).The sources that are actually used for RHEL releases are certainly not available on GitLab. E.g. the latest released version of webkit2gtk3 is currently 2.38.5-1.el9.2. You can try finding the source for that on GitLab, but it's not there because we don't have stable branches on GitLab. CentOS Stream went from 2.38.5-1.el9 to 2.40.1-1.el9.Or actually. What is the difference between 2.38.5-1.el9.2 and 2.38.5-1.el9 except the dist tag? I probably don't understand.
Ah, there is actually webkit2gtk3-2.38.5-1.el9_2.2 not webkit2gtk3-2.38.5-1.el9.2. I got it now.
Vít
And that might be problem that neither others understand. But I'd assume that only the disttag differs.VítOk, you are right. But there are two things:1) This was deliberate choice of maintainer, nothing else. Maintainer chosen to skip the 2.38.5 whatever the reason was2) Does it harm anything to have the 9.3 package sooner the having RHEL 9.3 out? Is it really less stable as was claimed elsewhere in the thread?Vít
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
