Dne 23. 06. 23 v 12:41 مصعب الزعبي napsal(a):
It will be more stable, effective, natural-friendly and feasible if we make Fedora lifetime as: - One year between releases. - Two year of release lifetime.
Why do you think this cadence is more effective, natural-friendly and feasible? Do you have data for that? Have you asked other developers? Users?
This idea of Fedora with longer release life appears every few months/years. Usually called Fedora LTS. What we have now is compromise of "we need to have fresh code" and "we need to have stable code" and "we need to have time to maintain it all".
Nothing stops you from organize people who share similar idea, create SIG. Gather the data about impact on infrastructure (that means money), impact on maintainers (are they willing to maintain packages two times longer?), and then you may ask FESCO to vote about it.
-- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
