Re: F39 Change Proposal: Clean Systemd-boot installs (Self-Contained_

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> == Detailed Description ==
> As a first pass, the 'inst.sdboot' option already in anaconda should
> work. As it stands, that replaces grub+shim with the systemd-boot
> loader, and moves the kernel + initrd to the EFI system partition
> (ESP). It doesn't attempt to create unified kernel images, so the
> existing `dnf update`, `kdumpctl`, and `make install` in a kernel
> source directory should all work.

What is the plan for existing UKIs, for example kernel-uki-virt.rpm?

I'd expect they should work fine without extra work (i.e. try a
kickstart file with '-kernel' + '-kernel-core' + 'kernel-uki-virt' in
the file list).

[ Side node: Right now the kernel-uki-virt %postinstall just does a copy
  to /boot/efi/EFI/Linux where systemd-boot should find them just fine.
  After systemd v254 release we which brings some kernel-install
  improvements for UKIs we should be able to switch over to use
  kernel-install instead ].

take care,
  Gerd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux