On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 12:50:13 +0200 Sandro <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 21-06-2023 10:51, Dan Horák wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have met a package that uses %autorelease and wanted to add a suffix > > to the release for my local test build that doesn't have to be > > compliant with the official versioning, but just differentiate interim > > builds. It's quite common to append eg. ".rhbz123456" or similar > > suffices. It looks to me that the current %autorelease doesn't allow > > that per [1]. Did I miss something or should I file a RFE? > > > > [1] https://docs.pagure.org/fedora-infra.rpmautospec/autorelease.html > > I think '%autorelease -e rhbz123456' should do what you want. per the docs it adds the string into the "middle" I would like to achieve NVR like systemd-250.10-2.fc36.rhbz123456 which you do with Release: 2%{?dist}.rhbz123456 in the classic spec file Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
