On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 08:46:47 -0000, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 09:16:28AM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > > > So one alternative is *not* to push the change to all branches. > > > > Unless it's really necessary, such as fixing an essential bug, I tend > > to leave older Fedora branches on a stable release, to reduce churn > > Exactly. Blindly pushing to all active releases is never a good idea. > Now, I'm not saying people here do that, but those shortcuts make it > too easy to do it in a rash ... > > In particular: Most proposals do it in the wrong order (old to new) > and some without error catching. You may end up with newer builds in > older releases - without an update yet, granted, but still. I think folks here on the list understand that each update needs to be vetted. Once it has been vetted and we know it can go to rawhide + other releases, it's nice to be able to do it quickly and move on to other packages. So shortcuts + automation is always welcome in cases where we know it's doing the right thing. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue