Re: SecureBoot certificates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



OK I tried this again and discover shim is signed twice.

        Issuer: C=US, ST=Washington, L=Redmond, O=Microsoft Corporation, CN=Microsoft Corporation UEFI CA 2011
            Not Before: Sep  9 19:40:20 2021 GMT
            Not After : Sep  1 19:40:20 2022 GMT

        Issuer: C=US, ST=Washington, L=Redmond, O=Microsoft Corporation, CN=Microsoft Corporation Third Party Marketplace Root
            Not Before: Jun 27 21:22:45 2011 GMT
            Not After : Jun 27 21:32:45 2026 GMT

This is the same for EFI/fedora/shimx64.efi and EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI which also have the same sha256sum hashes.

So maybe there isn't actually a problem other than it's confusing that there are two signatures that also have different validity periods? I'm not sure what it means.

--
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux