Re: Managing multiple cross-dependent patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear Chris,

On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 4:42 PM Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Dmitry Belyavskiy <dbelyavs@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> > I maintain OpenSSH that has a lot of heavy-interfering downstream
> > patches. I’d like to reduce the burden of rebase by combining some of
> > them.
>
> Wow that's a lot of patches.  Some appear to be Fedora specific, but a
> bunch seem like general fixes.  Has there been an attempt to upstream
> some of this?

Yes. Some of them were even accepted, but, for example, gss ones were
explicitly rejected.

-- 
Dmitry Belyavskiy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux