Re: LibreOffice packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/1/23 15:59, Christian Schaller wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 2:36 PM Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Why is a Flatpak a better choice for LibreOffice?
> 
> There are a lot of ways to answer this, but from any upstream the advantage
> of Flatpak is that it means package once and then deploy everywhere. So it
> saves them work.
> 
> From a Fedora perspective there is of course nobody telling anyone to not
> maintain LibreOffice as RPMS or as a Fedora flatpak going forward, but even
> if nobody does we have a good option available in the Flathub package,
> especially with the Flathub package not being verified as the official
> package of upstream LibreOffice.

Did you mean “now”?  “not” seems like the opposite of your intended meaning.

> Having things as Flatpaks is also of value for us to enable long term
> efforts such as Fedora Silverblue.
> 
> Hope this answers your question.
> 
> Christian-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux