Re: employment related packager groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 8:50 AM Philip Wyett <philip.wyett@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 07:50 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:52 PM Ali Erdinc Koroglu
> > <aekoroglu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 27/05/2023 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > > * Kevin Fenzi:
> > > >
> > > > > Today we have packager groups used in src.fedoraproject.org to allow a
> > > > > group of people to maintain packages. In the past this has been used for
> > > > > SIGs/packaging areas. ie, python-packaging-sig or robotics-sig or the
> > > > > like.
> > > > >
> > > > > FESCo has been asked about creating company related groups.
> > > > > ( https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2966 and https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2929 )
> > > > > ie, foocorp-sig / foocopr-packagers. These groups would then be used to
> > > > > help maintain packages that foocorp finds of interest/value.
> > > >
> > > > Will these groups automatically make members part of the packager group?
> > > > Or will that be a separate step?
> > >
> > > I think this can be like that: "To join the foocorp-SIG, packager group membership is a
> > > requirement"
> > >
> >
> > IMO, we should not call these SIGs either. I'm not sure exactly what
> > the naming convention should be, but one thought would be
> > "corp-maint_<corpname>" (or flip it around if you wish).
> >
> > e.g., "corp-maint_aiven" for Aiven employees.
> >
> >
>
> Maybe 'org' in the naming rather than 'corp' as not all businesses and entities are corps. More
> sedate naming and would cover other distros, charities and other groups in general?
>

Sure. I'm fine with that. I think it's just important to not call it a
SIG, because it's not a "special interest group" in the sense that we
use it for.

>
> --
> *** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***
>
>
> Associations:
>
> * Debian Maintainer (DM)
> * Fedora/EPEL Maintainer.
> * Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation.
>

Right, it's fairly well-known how broad my association in FOSS is too,
so I totally get this point. :)



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux