Il 27/05/23 11:56, Peter Oliver ha scritto: > > If we’re going to recommend migration to anything, shouldn’t it be enchant2? Users would be able to configure their preferred spellchecking engine per language (which I imagine is more important for some languages than others), and we wouldn’t have to go through this again in the future if we hypothetically decided that, say, Nuspell should replace Hunspell as our default spellchecker. > +1 here. If we have to convince upstream to migrate to a different default spellchecker, I think it's better to push enchant2. If it is about having the package maintainer build their package against another spellchecker, hunspell is fine, but drop a note about enchant2 is preferred. I'd also like to raise attention to what I think is a misleading Change Summary: > Deprecating aspell package because it is no longer > Required/Buildrequired by any package in Fedora. This is clearly not true, as the change is about migrating package to another spellchecker. Mattia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
