Re: employment related packager groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/26/23 20:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings everyone. 
> 
> Today we have packager groups used in src.fedoraproject.org to allow a
> group of people to maintain packages. In the past this has been used for
> SIGs/packaging areas. ie, python-packaging-sig or robotics-sig or the
> like. 
>
Thanks for the notice.  Can comment on ticket as well if preferred,
though possibly the tickets should be merged.

> FESCo has been asked about creating company related groups.
> ( https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2966 and https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2929 )
> ie, foocorp-sig / foocopr-packagers. These groups would then be used to
> help maintain packages that foocorp finds of interest/value. 
> This would help companies manage the people they pay to contribute.
> It would allow them to more easily add/remove employees as time goes on
> instead of someone having to go and add/remove someone from a bunch of
> packages.
> 
> So, I promised to start a thread here about this. 
> 
> Should such groups require FESCo approval?
> 
Probably yes.
> If so, what would be requirements to approve/deny?
> 
May need to revise SIG guidelines, it may be helpful for technology
related to a company rather than just company employees since users of
the technology may want to engage in packaging.  With increasing
diversity in computer architectures, expect to see a number of
specialized builds.

Encouraging inclusion of packages is good - there are people who may not
be packagers but can do the initial preparation to enable a SIG to adopt
a package.  However, want good reviews as well, there may be a
disincentive for thorough reviews just to include a package.  May also
be good to run a light weight version of fedora review on packages to
ensure they get updated after they have been included.
> Should we require some documentation? ie, should the group have to make
> a doc/wiki page explaining what it's for and how to reach group owners
> in case of problems?
> 
Yes.  Should also have a list of group members.
> Thoughts?
> 
> kevin
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux