Re: SecureBoot certificates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 2:20 PM Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was poking around a F38 system to look over the Secure Boot certificates and
> found something that may warrant attention.
>

I *suspect* this is all wrapped into the issue that
shims must now have/use NX support to be signed,
and that first requires the kernel patches that
support NX to be merged.

The thread about the NX requirement and the
kernel patch is included (although a bit hard
to find) in the ticket
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113005

I do not know where in the process the kernel patch
currently is (last I knew, it was still in review).
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux