On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:56:30AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 23/05/2023 19:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >... so today I was taking part in a package review which uses these > >macros and was surprised to be told that they are deprecated. > > Their author left Fedora a few years ago. They're now unmaintained > and may be removed soon (see FPC ticket[1]). > > [1]: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1270 So the issue for me is I'm considering a new package (opensbi). It is greatly(?) simplified by using the forge macros. Nothing in official documentation says that new packages shouldn't use the forge macros, although the link above would add such a statement. There seems to be disagreement in this thread about the best way forwards. Proposed spec: http://git.annexia.org/?p=fedora-reviews.git;a=blob;f=opensbi/opensbi.spec Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
