On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 06:44:16PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > I rebuild most of the packages > <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19#Current_status> Thank you! Much appreciated. > I left out: > > freeipa - upstream confirmed that no ebuild is needed Yup, nice find. > rust-rpm-sequoia - I believe there is no dependency on rpm and no rebuild > is needed. Can Michal explain why it is on his list? This one got there by accident, please ignore it. Our original query consisted of --qf '%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires 'librpm*.so.*' which obviously matches librpm_sequoia.so, too, and that one's required by rpm-sequoia-devel, which in turn is a binary package built from rust-rpm-sequoia, hence showing on the original list. > rpm-git-tag-sort-1.0-12.fc39 - fails to build for in unrelated reaon. > I have developed a fix and proposed it the > package maintainer and to the upstream. > I can apply it if there will be no action. OK, sounds good. Yeah, I noticed the failure too when doing a scratch build but didn't have the capacity to investigate further, hoping the maintainer would eventually get it sorted. If we could speed that up by proposing a fix, that's great, of course, so thank you! > annobin - a racing update: annobin-12.10-2.fc39 > gnome-software - a racing update: gnome-software-44.1-2.fc39 > systemtap - a racing update: systemtap-4.9-1.fc39 Actually, gnome-software has been rebuilt for our side-tag: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2203034 -- Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
