Re: RFC: X.Org X11 modularization project - rpm package driver naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dnia 08/27/2005 12:48 AM, Użytkownik Mike A. Harris napisał:

Hi!

Proposal:
~~~~~~~~
Here is my initial proposal for naming the src.rpms, along with
brief rationale, and the real (or perceived) advantages and
disadvantages:

xorg-x11-driver-<type>-<name>

	I don't have any rights to decide but this pattern looks very good to me :)

I'm curious how do you want to pack other tarballs? When I first saw this → http://xorg.freedesktop.org/X11R7.0-RC0/everything/ I was a bit shocked ;-O

Do you plan to have each bz2 archive in its own src.rpm or make packages using this names → http://xorg.freedesktop.org/X11R7.0-RC0/
For example:
		xorg-x11-app
		xorg-x11-data
		xorg-x11-doc
		xorg-x11-font
		xorg-x11-lib, etc.

First solution gives more flexibility to the end user - (s)he can install only necessary pacakges. The only disadvantage of this proposal I can see right now may be upgrade process from FC4 to FC5. It may take some time to write proper Provides/Obsoletes in spec files so yum could handle upgrade without a problem.

Regards,
	Dawid

--

  ^_*


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux