On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:13:43PM +0200, Michal Domonkos wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 01:03:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I think you should also consider packages that build require > > rpm-devel. libguestfs consumes the librpm API, so I'm not sure why it > > didn't make the list. > > Correct, our original query was anything but comprehensible, as it turns out. > Sigh. It didn't include the non-x86_64 arches and it didn't include rpm-libs, > as you noted (also not sure why it libguestfs wasn't picked up by the > soname-based query, though). libguestfs has one library: /usr/lib64/libguestfs.so.0, and it doesn't link to librpm. So maybe it doesn't need to be recompiled? Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
