Globe Trotter via devel wrote on 2023/05/15 23:36:
During unretirement of the package, I changed the dependency of slim from desktop-backgrounds to f??-backgrounds-base in order to have a uniform F-specific background for the slim login manager. However, the rawhide installation can not find it. Any suggestions on what to do? Thanks!
I don't think f39-backgrounds srpm is not packaged yet: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=package&terms=f*backgrounds* BTW I am not sure if slim itself should have such dependency for f*backgrounds - Usually such dependency is written on kickstart or comps file, I guess. Regards, Mamoru
----- Forwarded Message ----- From: bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx <bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx" <itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 at 06:41:54 AM CDT Subject: [Bug 2203836] New: F39FailsToInstall: slim https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2203836 Bug ID: 2203836 Summary: F39FailsToInstall: slim Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: slim Assignee: itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx Reporter: fti-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx QA Contact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx, pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Blocks: 2168845 (F39FailsToInstall,RAWHIDEFailsToInstall) Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically by https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/ftbfs-fti/follow-policy.py If you feel that this output has mistakes, please open an issue at https://pagure.io/releng/ Your package (slim) Fails To Install in Fedora 39: can't install slim: - nothing provides f39-backgrounds-base needed by slim-1.4.0-6.fc39.x86_64 If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. To reproduce, use the koji/local repo only, e.g. in mock: $ mock -r fedora-39-x86_64 --config-opts mirrored=False install slim P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages Thanks! Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168845 [Bug 2168845] Fedora 39 Fails To install Tracker
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
