On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 09:04:40PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > So, why having all those "Fedora Containers" releases in Bodhi which > > follow Fedora branches? Isn't just one Fedora Containers release enough? [...] > The "F38 Flatpaks" release in Bodhi represents Flatpaks built with the F38 > package set against the F8 runtime. But, yes, as you say we handle Flatpaks > as a single stream. Once we release Firefox into "F39 Flatpaks", everybody > on all releases gets that and we never do an update in "F38 Flatpaks" again. > > If updates *do* get pushed on multiple releases, last pushed wins. Might be > useful if we found that we pushed something to early or broken - but isn't > normal. > > But what if we had a single release instead? A few years ago, a design team contributor was working on an animated video extolling our painless upgrade process. But, in the midst of that, they updated to a new Fedora release, and discovered that Inkscape had dropped an obscure export format which they happened to rely on. I'd love it if we could produce both "fast" and "slow" streams. Ideally that's orthogonal to Fedora runtime release, but practically speaking that's what we have now. Maybe in the future we could build a "slow" stream as part of EPEL on a UBI or CentOS Stream runtime? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
