Re: F39 Change Proposal: Flatpaks without Modules (System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Owen Taylor:

> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 9:48 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  * Aoife Moloney:
>
>  > There are two types of Flatpak containers -
>  > runtimes - which contain unmodified Fedora packages,
>  > and applications - which contain Fedora packages rebuilt to relocate
>  > them from /usr to /app.
>
>  Is this relocation still required?
>
> Yes - the /app vs. /usr split is pretty fundamental to the operation
> of Flatpak, and this Change doesn't propose any changes to how Flatpak
> works, just how Flatpaks are built in Fedora.

Do you have a pointer where I can read up on the current approach?

I'm concerned that this is just like Software Collections with a
different path, which I believe where previously banned in Fedora (and
are generally a huge hassle on the releng side, I think).

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux