V Wed, May 10, 2023 at 09:45:35AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > Should we consider just retiring modular repos entirely? > > I do know there's a number of active module builds, but I am not sure > how much users use them. While RHEL still uses modules, EPEL has retired > their epel8 modular repos. > Speaking selfishly for my use case, not yet now. They are used as a development phase for RHEL modules. The upstream-downstream relation where downstream tries to push as much things to upstream to get early development and wider integration testing. > Can the things using modules now switch to compat packages in the main > repository? > Compat packages suffer from distinct package (and RPM Provides) names. That's something what modules neatly solved. I would like too see different solution which does not regress from modularity first. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
