Re: F39 proposal: BiggerESP (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 03:52:51PM -0000, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> 
> If the idea to allow a UKI to contain multiple alternate, signed,
> cmdline line profiles gets accepted [1], then a "rescue" image
> won't neccessarily need to be a separate image anymore. There could
> just be an alternative cmdline that caused the initrd to launch in
> a "rescue" / "safe" mode, and that would be nicely complemented by
> an A/B scheme to cope with bad kernel upgrades.
> 
> With regards,
> Daniel
> 
> [1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/24539

Yes, we should definitely have that. Had started scoping how to build it and encode it, but got distracted by other squirrels.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux