Re: Questions about qmake static libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/5/23 22:30, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 5/5/23 21:31, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm just starting to look into the mingw packages and building mingw executables with them - and in particular static building.  I'm hoping someone can clarify some things for me.

For "regular" libs we seem to have:

%{mingw32_bindir}/libexample-0.dll
%{mingw32_libdir}/libexample.dll.a

and for static libs:

%{mingw32_libdir}/libexample.a

so for example:

-rw-r--r--. 1 root root  7539008 Apr 11 18:00 /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/Qt5Gui.dll -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 13373318 Apr 11 18:00 /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Gui.a -rw-r--r--. 1 root root  6699310 Apr 11 18:00 /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Gui.dll.a

/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/Qt5Gui.dll:      PE32 executable (DLL) (GUI) Intel 80386, for MS Windows, 12 sections /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Gui.dll.a: current ar archive /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Gui.a:     current ar archive

 From what I've gleaned from some web searches is that the .dll.a file is an "import" library which seems to encode a dependency on the .dll library at runtime, while the plain .a file is a more "normal" static library.

So to link a static executable it looks like I want to be using libQt5Gui.a.  However, when attempting to build the x2goclient executable I'm ending up with the following link line:

i686-w64-mingw32-g++ -g -fstack-protector -static -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc -Wl,-subsystem,windows -mthreads -o release/x2goclient.exe @object_script.x2goclient.Release  -lssh.dll -lwinspool /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Svg.dll.a /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Widgets.dll.a /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Gui.dll.a -lgdi32 -lcomdlg32 -loleaut32 -limm32 -luxtheme -ljpeg -lpng -lharfbuzz /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Network.dll.a -lcrypt32 -ldnsapi -liphlpapi /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Core.dll.a -lz -lpcre2-16 -lversion -lole32 -luuid -lwinmm -lws2_32 -ladvapi32 -lshell32 -luser32 -lkernel32 -lnetapi32 -luserenv -liconv release/x2goclient_res.o -lmingw32 /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libqt5main.a -lshell32

with lots of references to the .dll.a files.  And from what I can tell, the x2goclient.exe executable does appear to have runtime dependencies on the various Qt dlls (e.g. Qt5Gui.dll, etc.).

I’m specifying a static config to qmake and QT is specified in the x2goclient.pro simply with:

QT += svg network

So I really have no idea where the .dll.a references are coming from. Some possibilities:

/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/Qt5Widgets.prl:
QMAKE_PRL_TARGET = libQt5Widgets.dll.a

$ rpm -qf /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/Qt5Widgets.prl
mingw32-qt5-qtbase-static-5.15.9-1.fc39.noarch

so that file is coming in as part of the -static package, but referring to the dll import file not the static file.  But I'm not finding similar files for the other libraries.

I'm starting to think that the issue is that both the static and shared builds of the libraries produce .prl files - but generally the static build is installed first and then the shared build, so the .prl files that are in the Fedora packages are for the shared libraries since they have the same path.

So - is there a way for the static .prl files to be installed in a different location for for qmake find them there?

Discovered a bit more information, and it's a bit more of a mess than initially thought:

qmake appears to look for the presence of "staticlib" in the module_config line of the .pri file to see if a static library is present.  e.g.:

/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/qt5/mkspecs/modules/qt_lib_svg.pri:

QT.svg.module_config = v2 staticlib

Now at least for QtSvg, the only difference between the static and shared version of the pri file is the presence of "staticlib".  So we might be able to get away with simply installing the static build after the shared build.

Also, it appears that the .prl files are really only necessary for static libraries, so we could just not build them for shared libraries with the "no_install_prl" CONFIG option:

MINGW_BUILDDIR_SUFFIX=_static %mingw_qmake_qt5 ../%{qt_module}.pro CONFIG+="static create_prl"
MINGW_BUILDDIR_SUFFIX=_static %mingw_make_build
MINGW_BUILDDIR_SUFFIX=_shared %mingw_qmake_qt5 ../%{qt_module}.pro CONFIG+="no_install_prl"
MINGW_BUILDDIR_SUFFIX=_shared %mingw_make_build

Next comes the pkgconfig files.  Again the only difference seems to be the addition of Libs.private:

diff -ru ./qtsvg-everywhere-src-5.15.9/build_win32_shared/lib/pkgconfig/Qt5Svgd.pc ./qtsvg-everywhere-src-5.15.9/build_win32_static/lib/pkgconfig/Qt5Svgd.pc --- ./qtsvg-everywhere-src-5.15.9/build_win32_shared/lib/pkgconfig/Qt5Svgd.pc   2023-05-05 21:51:48.559526488 -0600 +++ ./qtsvg-everywhere-src-5.15.9/build_win32_static/lib/pkgconfig/Qt5Svgd.pc   2023-05-05 21:50:58.634080123 -0600
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
  Description: Qt Svg module
  Version: 5.15.9
  Libs: -lQt5Svg
+Libs.private: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Widgets.dll.a /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Gui.dll.a -lgdi32 -lcomdlg32 -loleaut32 -limm32 -luxtheme -ljpeg -lpng -lharfbuzz /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libQt5Core.dll.a -lz -lpcre2-16 -lversion -lole32 -luuid -lwinmm -lws2_32 -ladvapi32 -lshell32 -luser32 -lkernel32 -lnetapi32 -luserenv -liconv -lz
  Cflags: -DQT_SVG_LIB -I${includedir}/QtSvg -I${includedir}
  Requires: Qt5Core Qt5Gui Qt5Widgets

which should be okay.  Although again we are presented with the pkgconfig files using .dll.a when they should be the .a file.


More complicated are the cmake files - they appear to be very different for the shared and static versions and so I think will need to live in different locations.  Although I don't think cmake files like to be moved from their install location so this will have to be handled differently.


Finally though the show stopper from my testing is that with staticlib present in the .pri module_config line, it seems that qmake will insist on using the static library.  So we seem to be back to needing a separate location for the static .pri and perhaps other files.


Has anyone else struggled with this and come up with better solutions?


It looks like perhaps the mingw-qt5-qtbase package contains some patches for dealing with static libraries.  Is something similar needed for qtsvg?

The mingw packaging guidelines don't seem to mention any of this issues - but I support most of them are qmake specific.

So it seems that this really isn't a mingw specific issue, but a qmake specific issue and that the only way to really support this would be to have a totally separate install root for the static libraries.

Is there any interest in supporting this or is this a bridge too far?

--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his  - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager                         720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office             FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                       orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301                 https://www.nwra.com/

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux