How fun! Thanks for the links and explanation.
On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 16:09, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 05. 05. 23 16:28, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Chris Kelley wrote on 2023/05/05 22:55:
>> As a purely logical _expression_, this simplifies to "GPL-2.0-or-later AND
>> LGPL-2.1-or-later". Is that sort of simplification not allowed?
>>
>
> This is no longer allowed:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_license_analysis
Also
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_combined_disjunctive_and_conjunctive_license_expressions
which says:
"""
The license _expression_ must reflect the disjunctive license choice even if one
or both of the license identifiers in the OR _expression_ also appear separately
in the composite license _expression_.
...
License: (GPL-3.0-or-later OR MPL-1.1) AND GPL-3.0-or-later AND MIT
Here we repeat GPL-3.0-or-later because for one binary component it appears as
part of an OR subexpression. That is, OR expressions must be treated as though
they were a single distinct license.
"""
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
