Sorry for the late reply. I just got back to this issue. > In general this (should) only happen if the binaries are really > identical (e.g. when one of the packages build requires the other, but > instead of linking/rebuilding some sources it simply copies a binary > directly). > > The build-id is (also) derived from the full nvra. So really cannot be > identical even if the sources are. But this relies on the binaries > being build with debuginfo. So maybe some code isn't build with -g? I *think* both neko and haxelib were built with debuginfo, as I can find `-g` in the logs. haxe's build log: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/haxe/4.2.5/5.fc38/data/logs/x86_64/build.log Relevant lines of building haxelib: [ 50%] Building C object CMakeFiles/haxelib.dir/run.c.o /usr/bin/gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -MD -MT CMakeFiles/haxelib.dir/run.c.o -MF CMakeFiles/haxelib.dir/run.c.o.d -o CMakeFiles/haxelib.dir/run.c.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/haxe-4.2.5/extra/haxelib_src/run.c /builddir/build/BUILD/haxe-4.2.5/extra/haxelib_src/run.c:105:13: warning: 'handle_signal' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 105 | static void handle_signal( int signal ) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ [ 75%] Linking C executable haxelib /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_link_script CMakeFiles/haxelib.dir/link.txt --verbose=1 /usr/bin/gcc -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -rdynamic CMakeFiles/haxelib.dir/run.c.o -o haxelib -lneko nekovm's build log: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/nekovm/2.3.0/11.fc38/data/logs/x86_64/build.log The line of building libneko: /usr/bin/gcc -fPIC -O2 -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-U_FORTIFY_SOURCE,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1 -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes -shared -Wl,-soname,libneko.so.2 -o bin/libneko.so.2.3.0 CMakeFiles/libneko.dir/vm/alloc.c.o CMakeFiles/libneko.dir/vm/builtins.c.o CMakeFiles/libneko.dir/vm/callback.c.o CMakeFiles/libneko.dir/vm/elf.c.o CMakeFiles/libneko.dir/vm/interp.c.o CMakeFiles/libneko.dir/vm/load.c.o CMakeFiles/libneko.dir/vm/objtable.c.o CMakeFiles/libneko .dir/vm/others.c.o CMakeFiles/libneko.dir/vm/hash.c.o CMakeFiles/libneko.dir/vm/module.c.o CMakeFiles/libneko.dir/vm/jit_x86.c.o CMakeFiles/libneko.dir/vm/threads.c.o -lgc -ldl -lm Did I miss some detail? Best regards, Andy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
