On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 10:47:15AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Our discourse instance is hosted for us by discourse.
> We shouldn't have to do maint on it, but we will have to do moderation,
> etc.
So... if maintaining discourse is too much overhead but it's okay to pay
someone else to handle, why can't that be done for our mailing list
infrastructure too? Even if that service offering is proprietary?
(hosted enterprise gitlab, anyone?)
And, for that matter, what of the other services currently
owned/hosted/maintained under the RH/Fedora roof? (For example, we're
going to be having this conversation again in the not-so-distant future
once RH finishes switching over to Jira and stops funding our Bugzilla
instance's upkeep..)
- Solomon
--
Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org (email&xmpp)
@pizza:shaftnet dot org (matrix)
Dowling Park, FL speachy (libra.chat)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
