If I add --allowerasing, some packages will be removed:
Removing dependent packages:
ffmpeg-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 2.2 M
libavcodec-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 9.6 M
libavdevice-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 228 k
libavfilter-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 4.4 M
libavformat-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 2.6 M
libavutil-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 836 k
libpostproc-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 127 k
libswresample-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 152 k
libswscale-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 632 k
ffmpeg-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 2.2 M
libavcodec-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 9.6 M
libavdevice-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 228 k
libavfilter-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 4.4 M
libavformat-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 2.6 M
libavutil-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 836 k
libpostproc-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 127 k
libswresample-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 152 k
libswscale-free x86_64 5.1.3-1.fc37 @updates 632 k
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 7:40 PM Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with ffmpeg-free provided by ffmpeg-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
- ffmpeg-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- conflicting requests
Problem 2: problem with installed package firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64
- conflicting requests
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.i686 conflicts with libavcodec-free provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
- package ffmpeg-libs-6.0-6.fc38.x86_64 conflicts with libavcodec-free provided by libavcodec-free-6.0-2.fc38.x86_64
- problem with installed package libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64
- libavcodec-free-5.1.3-1.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- firefox-112.0-3.fc37.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 5:49 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 06:30:36PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > > - problem with installed package msv-xsdlib-1:2013.6.1-19.fc33.noarch
> > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
> >
> > I'll add this one to fedora-obsolete-packages.
> >
> >
> It looks like you've only added the main package msv [0]. However, that
> package doesn't exist as a binary rpm, the srpm only produces msv-*
> subpackages [1]. And obsoleting the main package won't obsolete the
> subpackages, so this conflict is not fixed yet. I'm not sure if any of the
> other msv-* subpackages should also be obsoleted or just msv-xsdlib.
I adjusted f-o-p to just list them all. I don't think we want to keep some
subset of the subpackages.
Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
