Re: F38 DNF/RPM install errors due to header signatures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Stephen Smoogen <ssmoogen@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> The push is
> going to come in several 'waves' with SHA1 and DSA marked as bad now and in
> 1-2 years, SHA256 and RSA keys below 4096.

I know RSA under 4096 is on the way out (despite the VAST majority of
SSL certs using RSA 2048 keys), but I'm not aware of any push to
deprecate SHA-256.  Even the alternative to RSA certs, ECDSA, is still
signed with SHA-256.

-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux