On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 12:04 PM Zamir SUN <zsun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm working on libtraceevent and libtracefs update. There will be soname > bump happening to them. Namely, > > libtraceevent.so 1.6.3 -> 1.7.2 > libtracefs.so 1.5.0 -> 1.6.4 > > IIRC only kernel-tools (for perf and rtla) and trace-cmd depends on > them. So I'm also copying their corresponding contacts. > > As for libtraceevent, I've tried running trace-cmd/perf/rtla with the > new version and they still works. So I've updated it in Rawhide, Fedora > 38 and Fedora 37. They are now in Bodhi. First I wanted to say that pushing soname bumps to stable releases is a bad idea, but then I checked, abd both 1.6.3 and 1.7.2 of libtraceevent provide the same soname (libtraceevent.so.1()(64bit)) so there's no soname bump after all :) > As for libtracefs I've built it in side tag f39-build-side-65890. I plan > to update it in both Rawhide and Fedora 38 this week. The same applies to libtracefs - the soname for both v1.5.0 and v1.6.4 is libtracefs.so.1()(64bit). Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
