Re: SPDX: Consistency of tools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04. 04. 23 7:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
AFAIK both tool has been already migrated and will complain when you use short format.

At least rpmlint will not complain for old license identifiers.

rpmlint-fedora-license-data contains both

 - /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml and
 - /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml.

And rpmlint Requires it.

I wonder if we should split /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml into rpmlint-fedora-license-data-legacy and eventually stop rpmlint Requiring it e.g. in Fedora 39 as part of the SPDX Phase 2 change proposal.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux