Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 02/04/23 18:42, Fabio Valentini ha scritto:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 5:37 PM Mattia Verga via devel
> <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Il 31/03/23 17:27, Florian Festi ha scritto:
>>> On 3/31/23 15:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:42 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19
>>>>> == Detailed Description ==
>>>>> RPM 4.19 contains various improvements over previous versions. Many of
>>>>> them are internal in nature such as moving from automake to cmake,
>>>>> improvements to the test suite, stripping copies of system functions,
>>>>> splitting translations into a separate project and more. There are
>>>>> still several user facing changes:
>>>>>
>>>>> * New rpmsort(8) utility for sorting RPM versions
>>>> Handy!
>>>>
>>>>> * x86-64 architecture levels (v2-v4) as architectures
>>>> Could you explain more what this means, exactly?
>>> No! But here is the commit:
>>>
>>>    https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/cd46c1704ccd8eeb9b600729a0a1c8738b66b847
>>>
>>> It looks like it adds x86_64_v2, x86_64_v3 and x86_64_v4. Something
>>> about some x86_64 processors having additional capabilities.
>>>
>> Is there anyone who could provide some benchmarks to see if there are
>> significant performance improvements about using v2/v3/v3 versus plain
>> x86_64? If so, do you think we could drop building i686 by default (to
>> save some resources) and provide v2 (or v3, or v4) alongside x86_64?
> I don't think we can drop i686 as long as we need to support at least
> a subset of i686 for wine / steam / $your favourite 32-bit only
> third-party application.

Sure, I meant to change the current default of opting out i686 build
(ExcludeArch) to explicitly opting in only for required packages. I
think we're currently wasting resources by making needlessy builds on i686.

Those resources can possibly be spent on building v2/v3/v4 to enable
glibc-hwcaps as Dan pointed out OpenSuse is doing, but this is a
following step.

Mattia

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux