Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Mattia Verga via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Il 31/03/23 17:27, Florian Festi ha scritto:
>> On 3/31/23 15:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:42 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19
>>>> == Detailed Description ==
>>>> RPM 4.19 contains various improvements over previous versions. Many of
>>>> them are internal in nature such as moving from automake to cmake,
>>>> improvements to the test suite, stripping copies of system functions,
>>>> splitting translations into a separate project and more. There are
>>>> still several user facing changes:
>>>>
>>>> * New rpmsort(8) utility for sorting RPM versions
>>> Handy!
>>>
>>>> * x86-64 architecture levels (v2-v4) as architectures
>>> Could you explain more what this means, exactly?
>> No! But here is the commit:
>>
>>   https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/cd46c1704ccd8eeb9b600729a0a1c8738b66b847
>>
>> It looks like it adds x86_64_v2, x86_64_v3 and x86_64_v4. Something
>> about some x86_64 processors having additional capabilities.
>>
> Is there anyone who could provide some benchmarks to see if there are
> significant performance improvements about using v2/v3/v3 versus plain
> x86_64? If so, do you think we could drop building i686 by default (to
> save some resources) and provide v2 (or v3, or v4) alongside x86_64?

The only benchmark that *I* am aware of is this one done by Martin
Jambor: https://jamborm.github.io/spec-2022-07-29-levels/

tl;dr; v2 does not really bring notable improvements, only v3 but also
only in some selected synthetic benchmarks.


openSUSE Tumbleweed went a different route and chose to utilize
glibc-hwcaps instead:
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:X86-64-Architecture-Levels
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/factory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/ZOHLT4CQ7TDOJJ2VV7HKMN5G2MR2CTMD/


Cheers,

Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux