Ok, thanks, much appreciated!
Richard.
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 at 15:57, Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 28. 03. 23 16:53, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've got a package that's a mixture of BSD-3-Clause and BSD-4-Clause
> > (the original, old licence), and is current labelled "License: BSD" --
> > but I get the following:
> >
> > license-fedora2spdx BSD
> > Warning: more options on how to interpret BSD. Possible options:
> > ['BSD-1-Clause', 'BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD', 'BSD-2-Clause-Views',
> > 'BSD-2-Clause', 'BSD-3-Clause-Modification', 'BSD-3-Clause']
> > {{pick BSD choice}}
> >
> > Is BSD-4-Clause not a valid option? Any advice welcome. Thanks!
>
> The BSD-4-Clause license was called "BSD with advertising" in Fedora, not
> "BSD", that's why license-fedora2spdx does not offer it.
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
