On Sunday, 26 March 2023 01:56:32 CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Two weeks ago we had: > > * 23107 spec files in Fedora > > > > * 29503license tags in all spec files > > > > * 20302 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet > > > > * 8096 tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx` > > Today we have: > > * 22882 spec files in Fedora > > * 29366license tags in all spec files > > * 19784 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet(huray, we are under 20k) > > * 7912tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx` > > The list of packages needed to be converted is again here: > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-fi > nal.txt > > List by package maintainers is here > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-fi > nal-maintainers.txt Looking into this it lists for example: libtermkey asn salimma The spec file of libtermkey has: License: MIT Now going to https://spdx.org/licenses/ and looking for the SPDX Identifier shows: MIT License MIT What am I supposed to do as a maintainer of libtermkey? Best regards Andreas _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue