Re: Status of AVIF support in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:32 AM Sandro <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 15-03-2023 00:34, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 7:17 PM Sandro <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Apologies for my late response. I have been swamped with other things...
> >>
> >> On 27-02-2023 16:05, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 10:04 AM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, 2023-02-25 at 10:27 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It looks like libheif now supports a plugin architecture, so we could
> >>>>> move libheif to Fedora, while having the HEVC/H.265 backend plugin in
> >>>>> RPM Fusion.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Also, according to the CMake, the HEVC/H.265 plugins are not built by
> >>>>> default anymore:
> >>>>> https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/blob/cdcc5b210879e0a0348032a594f8be52bb739c0d/CMakeLists.txt#L92-L98
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So feel free to package it and bring it into Fedora. :)
> >>
> >> I'm willing to give it a try. Yet, just submitting the package and
> >> getting it into Fedora is probably not enough. Some co-ordination with
> >> RPMFusion would be needed, I guess. And consuming packages would need to
> >> be updated to properly use the new library.
> >>
> >> If anyone could guide/assist me with that, I'd be grateful.
> >>
> >>>> So we can build libheif without H.265 on Fedora but how you propose
> >>>> make H.265 available with one third repo ? just build the plugin on
> >>>> third repo as a freeworld package ?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> It may be possible to build the plugin independently and link to
> >>> libheif, but at the minimum, that's what I expect.
> >>
> >> The above exchange I do not quite grasp. I guess this is about making
> >> libheif-av1 (the Av1 only libheif, yet to be packaged) play nicely
> >> together with the unfree libheif (providing HEIF/libde265) provided by
> >> RPMFusion.
> >>
> >> To set things in motion I will try my hands on building a AV1 only
> >> libheif package and take it from there.
> >>
> >
> > Actually, I've got this done already locally. I can put it up for
> > review and you can grab it?
> >
> > Then I can give you co-maintainer privileges for it.
>
> Sure. That will work. Thanks Neal!
>

Here it is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178600



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux