Re: Degradated modules support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 10:20:21AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8 2023 at 04:10:15 PM +0100, Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > That could also affect seemingly unrelated parts of Fedora like Flatpaks
> > whose build process is based on modularity.
> 
> I can address this. We intend to stop depending on modularity so that we can
> reliably build Flatpaks even when modularity is broken.

Naive question: how does the approach with flatpak-builder would
compare to the current one with modularity?

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux