Re: Firecracker microVM manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 12:18:18AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> David Michael wrote:
> > - Firecracker can be built with Fedora's libc (glibc), but it is
> > officially unsupported upstream[3].  Functionality would be harmed by
> > not using musl, e.g. seccomp filters are not used.
> 
> Upstream's refusal to write seccomp filters that work with glibc should be a 
> red flag. It is definitely possible to sandbox glibc applications with 
> seccomp, e.g., Chromium does it. It does need updates/fixes to the seccomp 
> rules with almost every new version of glibc, but it is possible.

And since we're talking hypervisors, qemu also manages to use glibc &
implement a seccomp filter.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux