> I think so , see openssl example : > > dnf install openssl1.1-devel openssl-devel > > Package openssl-devel-1:3.0.8-1.fc37.x86_64 is already installed. > Error: > Problem: problem with installed package openssl-devel-1:3.0.8- > 1.fc37.x86_64 > - package openssl1.1-devel-1:1.1.1q-2.fc37.i686 conflicts with openssl- > devel provided by openssl-devel-1:3.0.8-1.fc37.x86_64 > - package openssl1.1-devel-1:1.1.1q-2.fc37.i686 conflicts with openssl- > devel provided by openssl-devel-1:3.0.5-3.fc37.x86_64 > - conflicting requests > - package openssl1.1-devel-1:1.1.1q-2.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with > openssl-devel provided by openssl-devel-1:3.0.8-1.fc37.x86_64 > - package openssl1.1-devel-1:1.1.1q-2.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with > openssl-devel provided by openssl-devel-1:3.0.5-3.fc37.x86_64 Thanks for pointing this out. Their compat had this in spec: ``` # The devel subpackage intentionally conflicts with main openssl-devel # as simultaneous use of both openssl package cannot be encouraged. # Making the packages non-conflicting would also require further # changes in the dependent packages. Conflicts: openssl-devel ``` I'm not sure this beats packaging guidelines, though ... _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
