> Il 03/03/23 19:00, Michael J Gruber ha scritto: > What about: > > - create a compat-portmidi0 package and move current portmidi there > (bonus: mark it as deprecated) > - change frescobaldi to require the compat package until a fix is available > - update current portmidi package to v2 That is possible in the long term, anyway. But it takes time unless you do this on released Fedoras, too. > BTW, this is not the first time such a discussion arise and I think > FESCo / Packaging Guidelines must provide a definitive answer for this. Thanks to Sergio I know a precedent know. I'll take another look at pm2 to see if can somehow avoid the conflicts without creating hardships for depending packages, and otherwise go for the middleground plan which will require a review for te "new" package in any case. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
