On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 8:48 PM Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What we're doing now — as has been the case for several years, already noted > in the previous discussion — has very little end-user value. While occasionally I have seen a small decrease in the size of the files transferred (which certainly can benefit some people some of the time), the total elapsed time of the transaction has always ended up being higher as the recreation of the original rpm exceeds the time that it would have taken me to just download the full new rpm (with an admittedly reasonably high speed network provider in my environment). However, that is an end user experience. What about the mirror providers? Even a small percentage of bandwidth savings might be useful for them (depending on their cost model) at the scale(s) they may be operating. Has anyone asked those providers, or do all (or most) now have a network cost structure such that it does not matter? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
