Re: Feedback wanted for a proposed improvement to RPM's ELF dependency generator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-02-20 10:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Does it have to be something which looks so much like it might be a
version number?  For example it could be helpful for debugging if the
generated requires was something like:

   Requires: libnghttp2.so.14()(64bit) >= soname.14.24.1


You mean the literal string "soname", right?  I don't know a reason that wouldn't work off the top of my head, but I also can't think of a reason that it would add information that wasn't inferred in the current iteration.  One reason we might want to stick with something that looks like a version is that we might need to extend the system to allow an epoch in the future (though I really hope that isn't necessary.)
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux