Re: F37 proposal: RPM Macros for Build Flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/10/23 00:07, Florian Weimer wrote:
I want to add documentation for this change, and found this proposal
self-contradictory.

== Summary ==
Create a corresponding macro for each compiler flag in the
redhat-rpm-config macro file and create "extra flag" macros to make it
easier for packages to add and remove compiler flags.

== Benefit to Fedora ==
* It will provide a standard way to disable existing compiler flags or
enable new ones that is more simple and robust than the existing echo
+ sed solution.

(I believe this is no longer relevant to the second version of the
proposal.)

* It will make it easier to determine which packages disable or add
compiler flags by doing a simple grep of the spec files.
* It will make it easier for toolchain developers to experiment with
adding new flags to the distribution as this can be done with a simple
macro definition instead of patching redhat-rpm-config.

The main problem are these two goals.  I don't think you can have it
both ways.

Here's a concrete example.  The proposal mentions compiler-rt.spec as a
potential use case.  Say it changes

     %global optflags %(echo %{optflags} -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE)

to:

     %global _pkg_extra_cflags -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE

While this is arguably useful (second use case), after this change, it
is no longer possible to inject additional build flags via
_pkg_extra_cflags from the outside (third use case).

Do we actually need two sets of macros, with distinct use cases?


This is a good point.  So, it seems like adding something like
%_distro_extra_cflags in addition to %_pkg_extra_cflags might make
sense.  However, as I've been working on this, it seems to me that
the ability to inject distro-wide build flags (%_distro_extra_flags)
is much more useful that having a convenience macro for packages to
add their own flags (%_pkg_extra_cflags).  So, just renaming %_pkg_extra_flags
to %_distro_extra_cflags would be OK with me too.


-Tom


Thanks,
Florian

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux