Re: Hoping to disable i686 and 32-bit arm for Podman and related tools for existing Fedora releases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:01 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
<devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does dropping the 32-bit i686 build also imply you cannot use 32-bit
> containers on a 64-bit architecture? If so, will anybody notice? Since you
> did not use any special naming tricks (both package naming and file naming)
> to allow installing both versions (as in, e.g., wine), one has to go out of
> one's way to install the 32-bit version instead of the 64-bit one, and they
> cannot both be installed at once.

Checked with the team and I'm told 32-bit containers on 64-bit arch
should not be impacted.

HTH.

Thanks.
-- 
Lokesh
Libera, GitLab, GitHub, Fedora: lsm5
Matrix: @lsm5:lsm5.ems.host
GPG: 0xC7C3A0DD
https://keybase.io/lsm5
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux