Re: Will dnf5 be ready by F39?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2023-02-03 21:49, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
A PackageKit backend for dnf5 would also work and I have no doubt it
will happen regardless. Surely that'd be the best option for Fedora if
dnfdaemon does not have the same D-Bus API that PackageKit does,
because pushing dnf-specific code into upstream projects when
PackageKit exists is not very friendly.
Pushing DNF-specific code is also unlikely to happen for projects such as 
KDE Plasma Discover, so if we want those to keep working, we will need the 
PackageKit D-Bus API implemented one way or the other.


Sharing the same point of view, I failed to understand why as open source the community failed to properly produce a better documentation for a plugin and better documentation  for a cross platform front package manager like PackageKit while continuing to yet another fragmentation.
-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux