On 2023-02-03 21:49, Kevin Kofler via
devel wrote:
Sharing the same point of view, I failed to understand why as open source the community failed to properly produce a better documentation for a plugin and better documentation for a cross platform front package manager like PackageKit while continuing to yet another fragmentation.Michael Catanzaro wrote:A PackageKit backend for dnf5 would also work and I have no doubt it will happen regardless. Surely that'd be the best option for Fedora if dnfdaemon does not have the same D-Bus API that PackageKit does, because pushing dnf-specific code into upstream projects when PackageKit exists is not very friendly.Pushing DNF-specific code is also unlikely to happen for projects such as KDE Plasma Discover, so if we want those to keep working, we will need the PackageKit D-Bus API implemented one way or the other. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer |
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue