On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:27 PM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I have just realized, that the rpmautospec is not documented in the > guidelines (unless my search-fu is failing me). Therefore I consider it > strange that we should go from "no documentation at all" to "use it by > default". I don't think this is right. > > IOW why is it not documented yet as an optional feature? Well ... because nobody has submitted any proposal of documenting this to the Packaging Guidelines? I put it on my TODO list to write up rpmautospec documentation for the Packaging Guidelines a while ago ... but TODO list keeps growing and less important things keep getting pushed to the bottom of the list. :) Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
