On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 12:46 PM Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The review had gone through, and had created the package, then retired > it, but as the APIs are different, and this also applies to another > package I have under review, mbedTLS, wanted to know if there are > general guidelines on this. > > For Catch, there was an upgrade from 1 to 2. Similarly for FFTW, the > main package uses the name FFTW, but it was FFTW3 before hand. Maybe one > could use Catch3 or Catch2v3? Then change names later once more packages > use the v3 interface? > Normally older versions are broken out into versioned legacy packages and the main package is upgraded. Then reverse dependencies are either upgraded or pinned as needed. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
