Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February​

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 4:09 AM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 29. 01. 23 18:15, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> I would like to request exemptions for:
>
>     llvm11                                           jistone, petersen, sergesanspaille, tstellar
>     llvm12                                           petersen, sergesanspaille,tstellar
>
> which are still needed by various packages, the latter also including
> ghc8.10-compiler.aarch64, ghc9.0-compiler.aarch64, ghc9.2-compiler.s390x, and
> ghc9.4-compiler.s390x

Could you please open a ticket at https://pagure.io/fesco/issues

 
Do you happen to know why the llvm versions haven't been built/buildable since F35?

Various tedious build errors on different archs, which don't look fun to fix.
If someone has ideas and even better time to help, that would be really great.

Jens
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux