Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/01/23 21:54:
Lukas Javorsky wrote on 2023/01/23 21:39:
Hi,
I've been looking at our upstreamed test [1] for libarchive package and it
started to fail since Fedora 37.
The error is: "gcc: fatal error: environment variable 'RPM_ARCH' not defined
"
Prior to the Fedora 37 the test was passing without any issue.
Did anyone here had a similar problem?
Or could anyone help me find out what has changed so it's causing this
issue?
[1]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/tests/libarchive/blob/main/f/Sanity/Basic-sanity-test-for-libarchive
Thank you so much for your help
Most possibly due to "package note".
`rpmbuild -bc` defines %{_package_note_flags}, embeds "-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes"
to LDFLAGS, which needs "RPM_ARCH" environment. During rpmbuild process, this environment is provided,
but then later "make" process does not define this automatically (because this process is not under
"rpmbuild"), so embedded "-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes" LDFLAGS complains about
missing environment.
(Yes, I think this is annoying - sometimes rpmbuild fails with some reason, I try to fix compilation error
then try executing "make" locally, then I see linker complains about "'RPM_ARCH' not defined"...)
I usually write "%_package_note_flags %nil" to ~/.rpmmacros, not sure if rpmbuild command line can
undefine macros.
Or maybe changing to "rpmbuild --define '_package_note_flags %nil' -bc libarchive.spec" can fix the
issue you see.
Mamoru
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
