On Sat, 2023-01-21 at 20:52 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:18 AM Michal Konecny <mkonecny@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > I would say that the current way is OK, the bot asks fedora-scm- > > requests > > admins to validate the requests, because it is marked as exception. > > After being validated it gets created. > > > > Or if there should be an exception for Rust packages, we can add > > name > > validation and if the name of the package is rust something, we can > > skip > > the validation process. But this unfortunately let people create > > any > > repository with name rust with exception set to true without any > > validation and I'm not sure if we want this. > > I don't think there should be any special-casing of Rust packages. > The > same guidelines for compat packages apply to them as to any other > package, so I don't see why they should be processed differently > (i.e. > without human validation). > One half-way solution might be to allow different operators to approve certain requests -- e.g. if for rust-*[NUM] requests with exceptions, @rust-sig members also get pinged and can approve such requests. Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
