Re: Improving Fedora boot time when libvirt is installed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:32:24AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 2023-01-19 09:48, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > The idea is that an application will put a dep on the
> > specific libvirt-daemon-driver-XXX that its functionality
> > requires. If Boxes requires storage APIs, then add a
> > Requires: libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-core, along with
> > any of the storage backends Boxes uses.
> 
> 
> It looks like there are currently ~ 13 packages that currently require
> libvirt or libvirt-daemon-kvm that would need review and possibly
> adjustment, and I'm willing to do that work, but I have to ask:  How likely
> is it that "fedora-comps" would accept a PR that narrows the libvirt package
> set in the "virtualization" and "virtualization-headless" groups?

I think that would be an acceptable PR personally. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux