Re: When to close CVE's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/20/23 11:47, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
I agree, and that seems to be an artifact of
the single Fedora component in RHBZ, which
treats Fedora as one thing.

I supposed (in theory again) that there could
be a master bugzilla for the CVE which depends
on child bugzillas for each impacted Fedora
release, and would get (auto) closed only when
all the child bugzillas are resolved (either by
updates or the Fedora release aging out).

Alternatively, an entirely different bugzilla for
each Fedora release (but as Fedora is just
a single component, unlike each RHEL
which has different components for each
version, I don't think that works).
Small clarification: where you wrote 'component' you meant 'product' :-) BZ has both Products and Components, forming two levels. RHEL 7/8/9 are Products, on the same level as Fedora.

--
Kevin P. Fleming
He/Him/His
Principal Program Manager, RHEL
Red Hat US/Eastern Time Zone
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux